![]() We understand this framework has a building potential vis-à-vis the interpretation of the Polychrome Tradition of Amazonia, an archaeological entity surrounded by classification handicaps. This argument is accompanied by a discussion about the concept of “hybridity” in addressing the histories of indigenous groups in Amazonia and examples of ways to deal with archaeological contexts marked by this fluidity. In this chapter, focusing on Tupian contexts, we argue that the dynamic of interactions played by mainstream riverine groups, permeated by a conflict-exchange continuum, might present a useful prospect to understand the historical paths that led to this heterogenic characterization. The latter frequently have explained these anomalies as intrusions from boundary groups, while neglecting to ask the historical meaning to account for these “misfit” groups, regarding them mostly as intrusive occupations or frontier groups, without explaining what “intrusive” and “frontier” mean. Fitting cultural traits such as the ceramic styles and languages of specific indigenous groups in Amazonia into the often-homogenous character of classifications may sometimes be a difficult task for researchers. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |